Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Pink Floyd-Shine On_X-View by madforstereo Pink Floyd-Shine On_X-View by madforstereo
2D to 3D conversion of 1992 Pink Floyd 25th anniversary box-set "Shine On".
Original cover art by Storm Thorgerson - Hipgnosis.

Use cross-eyed viewing to see 3D.
Add a Comment:
 
:iconspiritofcat:
spiritofcat Featured By Owner Oct 1, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
You're a true master at these conversions. So much detail in the depth that you create!
Reply
:iconmadforstereo:
madforstereo Featured By Owner Oct 1, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
Thank you very much. Really appreciated!
Reply
:iconwonderdookie:
WonderDookie Featured By Owner Sep 30, 2012  Hobbyist Artisan Crafter
That's crazy. How do you do these? It is just a whole lot of little tweaks? It seems crazy to do these with such a three dimensional image.
Reply
:iconmadforstereo:
madforstereo Featured By Owner Oct 1, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
Thank you very much! Basically, I use the same technique as you did. But to do the more subtle detail, and bring all to life, there are other methods available. One of them is called depthmapping.
Reply
:iconwonderdookie:
WonderDookie Featured By Owner Oct 2, 2012  Hobbyist Artisan Crafter
Cool. That must have been a bit tedious!
Reply
:iconmadforstereo:
madforstereo Featured By Owner Oct 2, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
Thanks! Yes a bit, but not as tedious as most of the others:-)
Reply
:iconraj2akki:
raj2akki Featured By Owner Sep 28, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
awesome........
Reply
:iconmadforstereo:
madforstereo Featured By Owner Sep 28, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
Thank you!
Reply
:iconmasyankaya:
masyankaya Featured By Owner Sep 23, 2012
AWESOME!
Reply
:iconmadforstereo:
madforstereo Featured By Owner Sep 23, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
Thank you Mary :-) I got some more of these soon, so keep checking...
Reply
:iconhomerjk85:
homerjk85 Featured By Owner Sep 22, 2012
Very well done! Your work is so clean! On average how long does it take you to do a conversion?
Reply
:iconmadforstereo:
madforstereo Featured By Owner Sep 23, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
Thank you very much Homer :-) This one, I believe, took about nine hours. The one I'm working on now took about twenty hours on pre-selections alone and is nearly finished in around ninety hours total. So I guess a loose estimate of forty or so hours? ;-) ...perfectionism is no blessing
Reply
:iconhomerjk85:
homerjk85 Featured By Owner Sep 23, 2012
Wow! I haven't worked on any of mine for more then 6 hours. But I guess that's why you get such awesome results :)

P.S. My name is Jon, Homer is a Simpsons reference I've used for years :)
Reply
:iconmadforstereo:
madforstereo Featured By Owner Sep 23, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
I apologize Jon, I should have looked better. By the way then, your surname sounds Dutch, or am I mistaking?
Your conversions are fine, given the fact that you seem to work only with depthmaps. Try cutting your images in smaller parts on separate layers and adding use of different tools to deform the objects you isolate. See what happens... ;-)
Reply
:iconhomerjk85:
homerjk85 Featured By Owner Sep 23, 2012
Its not a problem I was just letting you know :) honestly I think my surname (Gephart) is German but I'm not positive about that. LOL

Starting from my "Iron Man" conversion I have been using a technique where I separate the image into 3 parts (foreground, middle,and background). I completely remove the separated object from the layer before it. then using 3 depthmaps and my photoshop action. The reason I moved away from the depthmap only technique is that I am now working with lenticular lenses. With lenticular lenses I need at least 6 separate images instead of just 2 with stereo, depth maps alone cant do that do that very well.
Reply
:iconmadforstereo:
madforstereo Featured By Owner Sep 23, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
Wow, lenticular, I've been thinking 'bout that but wouldn't know how to start. Seen some d.i.y. kits on the Internet...
Reply
:iconhomerjk85:
homerjk85 Featured By Owner Sep 24, 2012
Its not as easy as i initially thought it would be, but the results you get can be amazing. I went through vuethru.com at first I bought a 10 pack of 8x10 60 LPI lenses, with that they sent me their whole sample package for free (I'm not sure it that is a standard practice or not) they provide the software but not much instruction. so you just have to create the 6 or so images to put into the provided software. So if your up for the challenge of making all of those images I would say go for it! It's really awesome handing someone a 3D image and not having to hand them glasses too.LOL
Reply
:iconmadforstereo:
madforstereo Featured By Owner Sep 24, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
Whoah....ehmm (scratch head)..., based on the above, I believe spending an average 240 hours on a conversion is a bit too much, even for me :lol: For now I'll stick to my habit and hope that people have their own anaglyph glasses...
Reply
:iconhiscules:
Hiscules Featured By Owner Sep 18, 2012
Should probably stare at this (Amazin') work of yours while listening to PF (in STEREO:D)!
Reply
:iconmadforstereo:
madforstereo Featured By Owner Sep 18, 2012  Hobbyist Artist
Thank you very much Hiscules!
...depends on whether you like their music too, or just this picture :-)
I like both...
Reply
:iconhiscules:
Hiscules Featured By Owner Sep 19, 2012
Both 2, but haven't got so many albums...
And You are welcome!
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×




Details

Submitted on
September 17, 2012
Image Size
635 KB
Resolution
1024×688
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
1,828 (1 today)
Favourites
19 (who?)
Comments
21
×